Prasugrel Bests Ticagrelor in Acute Coronary Syndrome Care

METHODOLOGY:

  • Researchers used data from a German insurance claims database between January 2012 and December 2021 to emulate the ISAR-REACT5 trial within routine care settings.
  • They included 17,642 propensity score–matched adults (mean age, 63.1 years; 26.1% women) who were discharged after an invasive treatment strategy for acute coronary syndrome and received either ticagrelor (n = 8821) or prasugrel (n = 8821) in an outpatient setting.
  • The types of coronary syndromes included STEMI, non-STEMI, and unstable angina (n = 9793, 6558, and 1291, respectively); 98.5% patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention.
  • The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, MI, or stroke within 1 year of initiation of outpatient treatment with either of the two medications.
  • The secondary endpoints included the individual components of the primary endpoint along with stent thrombosis; major bleeding was included as the safety endpoint.

TAKEAWAY:

  • At the 1-year follow-up mark, individuals receiving ticagrelor showed a higher risk for the primary composite endpoint than those receiving prasugrel (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24; 95% CI, 1.12-1.37).
  • Compared with prasugrel, ticagrelor was associated with higher incidences of both MI (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.06-1.36) and stroke (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.02-1.74) but not all-cause mortality.
  • No significant differences in stent thrombosis and major bleeding risk were observed between the two treatment groups.
  • In the STEMI subgroup, prasugrel was associated with the primary composite end point in a smaller proportion of patients than ticagrelor (6.8% vs 9.3%); however, in the non-STEMI and unstable angina subgroups, both drugs showed comparable efficacy.

 

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/prasugrel-bests-ticagrelor-acute-coronary-syndrome-care-2024a1000m0x